Task-specific risk assessment
Hazards, people at risk, existing controls, residual risk rating and the additional controls needed for this site.

Health & Safety
Risk assessments and method statements that read like the job in front of you — not a template with your logo dropped on it. Written to pass principal contractor review first time.
RAMS is a risk assessment and method statement submitted together before construction work starts: the risk assessment sets out the hazards and controls, the method statement sets out the sequence of work. We write both as one site-specific document, using your real task, plant, access arrangements and client requirements.
Hazards, people at risk, existing controls, residual risk rating and the additional controls needed for this site.
Sequence of work, access and egress, plant and equipment, exclusion zones, permits and who is responsible at each stage.
Substance assessments, manual handling and work-at-height detail added where the task calls for it.
We mark up your existing RAMS, tell you why they are being rejected and rewrite the sections that need it.
Almost every rejection comes down to the same three things: the document is generic, the sequence does not match how the work will really be done, or the controls named are not achievable on that site. Reviewers spot a template immediately.
We start from your task and site — the access route, the plant, the neighbours, the client's site rules — so the document answers the questions a reviewer is going to ask before they ask them.
Send us the task description, the site address, drawings or a site plan if you have them, and any client-specific requirements or templates you have been told to use.
We write the document, send it for your review, and adjust it until you are happy. If the principal contractor comes back with comments after submission, we handle the amendments.
FAQs
Tell us the course, the site or the problem. We will come back with options, dates and a straight answer.